[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh/ovYMV104jc+CE@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:59:25 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>,
Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@...ndries.io>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@...ndries.io>,
Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>, u-boot@...ts.denx.de,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: add UBI binding
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>
> UBI is often used on embedded devices to store UBI volumes with device
> configuration / calibration data. Such volumes may need to be documented
> and referenced for proper boot & setup.
>
> Some examples:
> 1. U-Boot environment variables
> 2. Device calibration data
> 3. Default setup (e.g. initial password)
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> ---
> .../bindings/mtd/partitions/ubi.yaml | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/ubi.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/ubi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/ubi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cd081f06d4cb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/ubi.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/partitions/ubi.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: UBI (Unsorted Block Images) device
> +
> +description: |
> + UBI is a layer providing logical volumes (consisting of logical blocks) on top
> + of raw flash devices. It deals with low-level flash issues (bit-flips, bad
> + physical eraseblocks, wearing) providing a reliable data storage.
> +
> + UBI device is built and stored in a single flash partition.
> +
> + Some (usually embedded) devices use UBI volumes of specific names or indexes
> + to store setup / configuration data. This binding allows describing such
> + volumes so they can be identified and referenced by consumers.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: partition.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: ubi
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^volume-[0-9a-f]+$":
> + type: object
> + description: UBI volume
> + properties:
> + volume-name:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> + volume-id:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - volume-name
> + - required:
> + - volume-id
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + partitions {
> + compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + partition@0 {
> + compatible = "ubi";
> + reg = <0x0000000 0x1000000>;
> + label = "filesystem";
> +
> + env: volume-0 {
> + volume-name = "u-boot-env";
Why not do 'compatible = "u-boot,env";' to align with normal partitions?
Or 'label'?
We have enough ways to identify things, I don't think we need another.
> + };
> +
> + calibration: volume-1 {
Are 0 and 1 meaningful or just made up indexing?
> + volume-id = <99>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists