[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877d9dx98p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 04:35:02 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, f.suligoi@...m.it,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsi: Add check for clk_enable
Hi Jiasheng
Thank you for your patch
> As the potential failure of the clk_enable(),
> it should be better to check it and return error
> if fails.
>
> Fixes: ab6f6d85210c ("ASoC: fsi: add master clock control functions")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
(snip)
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->ick);
> + if (ret)
> + goto disable_xck;
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->div);
> + if (ret)
> + goto disable_ick;
>
> clock->count++;
> }
>
> return ret;
> +
> +disable_xck:
> + clk_disable(clock->xck);
> +disable_ick:
> + clk_disable(clock->ick);
> +err:
> + return ret;
> }
I think disable_ick() / disable_xck() order are inverted ?
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists