lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <877d9dx98p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 04:35:02 +0000 From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn> Cc: broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, f.suligoi@...m.it, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsi: Add check for clk_enable Hi Jiasheng Thank you for your patch > As the potential failure of the clk_enable(), > it should be better to check it and return error > if fails. > > Fixes: ab6f6d85210c ("ASoC: fsi: add master clock control functions") > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn> (snip) > + if (ret) > + goto err; > + ret = clk_enable(clock->ick); > + if (ret) > + goto disable_xck; > + ret = clk_enable(clock->div); > + if (ret) > + goto disable_ick; > > clock->count++; > } > > return ret; > + > +disable_xck: > + clk_disable(clock->xck); > +disable_ick: > + clk_disable(clock->ick); > +err: > + return ret; > } I think disable_ick() / disable_xck() order are inverted ? Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists