[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220302011433.2054613-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 01:14:33 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/topology: avoid calling synchronize_rcu()
From: Lv Ruyi (CGEL ZTE) <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>
Kfree_rcu() usually results in even simpler code than does
synchronize_rcu() without synchronize_rcu()'s multi-millisecond
latency, so replace synchronize_rcu() with kfree_rcu().
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi (CGEL ZTE) <lv.ruyi@....com.cn>
---
kernel/sched/topology.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 974212620fa1..0ce302b4d732 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1970,8 +1970,7 @@ static void sched_reset_numa(void)
if (distances || masks) {
int i, j;
- synchronize_rcu();
- kfree(distances);
+ kfree_rcu(distances);
for (i = 0; i < nr_levels && masks; i++) {
if (!masks[i])
continue;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists