[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh9B+wKDKXHZ6ly/@google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 10:07:55 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared
whilst still in use
On Wed, 02 Mar 2022, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:54:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() already holds the mutex during its call
> > to vhost_get_vq_desc(). All we have to do is take the same lock
> > during virtqueue clean-up and we mitigate the reported issues.
> >
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=279432d30d825e63ba00
>
> This issue is similar to [1] that should be already fixed upstream by [2].
>
> However I think this patch would have prevented some issues, because
> vhost_vq_reset() sets vq->private to NULL, preventing the worker from
> running.
>
> Anyway I think that when we enter in vhost_dev_cleanup() the worker should
> be already stopped, so it shouldn't be necessary to take the mutex. But in
> order to prevent future issues maybe it's better to take them, so:
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Thanks for the analysis and the review Stefano.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists