linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] MIPS: Modify mem= and memmap= parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8956c625-c18d-846e-3e65-7920776b27f3@loongson.cn>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:50:49 +0800
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] MIPS: Modify mem= and memmap= parameter



On 03/01/2022 10:31 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:51:23PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/01/2022 05:55 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:57PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>> In the current code, the kernel command-line parameter mem= and memmap=
>>>> can not work well on MIPS, this patchset refactors the related code to
>>>> fix them.
>>>>
>>>> For kdump on MIPS, if the users want to limit the memory region for the
>>>> capture kernel to avoid corrupting the memory image of the panic kernel,
>>>> use the parameter memmap=limit@...e is the proper way, I will submit a
>>>> patch to use memmap=limit@...e for kexec-tools after this patchset is
>>>> applied.
>>>
>>> Sorry, apparently I misread the prevoius version.
>>> What's wrong with the current implementation of mem=limit@...e for the
>>> kdump case?
>>
>> In the current code, without this patchset, kernel boot hangs when add
>> mem=3G, mem=3G@64M or memmap=3G@64M to the command-line, it means that
>> the parameter mem= and memmap= have bug on mips.
>
> I can see how mem=3G may be wrong when the memory does not start at 0, but
> it seems to do the right thing of mem=3G@....
>
> Do you see system hangs with mem=3G@...?

Yes.

>
> Do you have the logs before the hang?

Here are the logs:

[    0.000000] Linux version 5.17.0-rc3+ (loongson@...ux) (gcc (GCC) 
7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-6), GNU ld version 
2.28-13.fc21.loongson.6) #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 2 09:07:39 CST 2022
[    0.000000] CpuClock = 1800000000
[    0.000000] The bridge chip is LS7A
[    0.000000] CP0_Config3: CP0 16.3 (0xdc8030a0)
[    0.000000] CP0_PageGrain: CP0 5.1 (0x28000000)
[    0.000000] NUMA: Discovered 4 cpus on 1 nodes
[    0.000000] Node0: mem_type:1, mem_start:0x200000, mem_size:0xee MB
[    0.000000]        start_pfn:0x80, end_pfn:0x3c00, num_physpages:0x3b80
[    0.000000] Node0: mem_type:2, mem_start:0x90200000, mem_size:0x6fe MB
[    0.000000]        start_pfn:0x24080, end_pfn:0x40000, 
num_physpages:0x1fb00
[    0.000000] Node0: mem_type:2, mem_start:0x120000000, mem_size:0x1600 MB
[    0.000000]        start_pfn:0x48000, end_pfn:0xa0000, 
num_physpages:0x77b00
[    0.000000] Node0's addrspace_offset is 0x0
[    0.000000] Node0: start_pfn=0x80, end_pfn=0xa0000
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 0 on node 0
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 1 on node 0
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 2 on node 0
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 3 on node 0
[    0.000000] printk: bootconsole [early0] enabled
[    0.000000] CPU0 revision is: 0014c001 (ICT Loongson-3)
[    0.000000] FPU revision is: 00f70501
[    0.000000] MSA revision is: 00060140
[    0.000000] OF: fdt: No chosen node found, continuing without
[    0.000000] MIPS: machine is loongson,loongson64g-4core-ls7a
[    0.000000] User-defined physical RAM map overwrite
[    0.000000] Kernel sections are not in the memory maps
[    0.000000] Initrd not found or empty - disabling initrd


>
> As for memmap= option, it does not specify the memory map but rather alters
> the memory map passed by the firmware. Particularity in MIPS implementation
> it allows to add a single range of available or reserved memory.
>
> AFAIU, for the kdump use-case mem=X@Y should suffice.

We can modify some code to make mem=X@Y work well,
but according to Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt,
the common way is mem=X and memmap=X@Y, so mem=X@Y for mips seems
odd, the intention of this patchset is to make mem= and memmap=
work well and consistent with the other archs.

Thanks,
Tiezhu

>
>> Thanks,
>> Tiezhu
>>
>>>
>>>> v4: Fix some build warnings reported by kernel test robot
>>>>
>>>> v3: Modify patch #3 to maintain compatibility for memmap=limit{$,#,!}base,
>>>>     commented by Mike Rapoport, thank you
>>>>
>>>> v2: Add some new patches to support memmap=limit@...e
>>>>
>>>> Tiezhu Yang (4):
>>>>   MIPS: Refactor early_parse_mem() to fix mem= parameter
>>>>   memblock: Introduce memblock_mem_range_remove_map()
>>>>   MIPS: Refactor early_parse_memmap() to fix memmap= parameter
>>>>   MIPS: Remove not used variable usermem
>>>>
>>>>  arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>>>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>>>>  mm/memblock.c            |  9 +++++--
>>>>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.1.0
>>>>
>>>
>>
>