[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b41b508-cc40-9039-250d-0d29a78abbab@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:34:12 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/cpuid: Stop exposing unknown AMX Tile Palettes
and accelerator units
Let me try pinging again until it times out or fails.
On 9/2/2022 5:29 pm, Like Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> KVM does not have much filtering in exposing the host cpuid (at least for Intel
> PT and AMX),
> and innocent user spaces could be corrupted when unknown new bits are
> accidentally exposed.
>
> Comments on code changes in this direction are welcome.
>
> + https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220112041100.26769-1-likexu@tencent.com/
>
> On 17/1/2022 2:59 pm, Like Xu wrote:
>> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>>
>> Guest enablement of Intel AMX requires a good co-work from both host and
>> KVM, which means that KVM should take a more safer approach to avoid
>> the accidental inclusion of new unknown AMX features, even though it's
>> designed to be an extensible architecture.
>>
>> Per current spec, Intel CPUID Leaf 1EH sub-leaf 1 and above are reserved,
>> other bits in leaves 0x1d and 0x1e marked as "Reserved=0" shall be strictly
>> limited by definition for reporeted KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID.
>>
>> Fixes: 690a757d610e ("kvm: x86: Add CPUID support for Intel AMX")
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index c55e57b30e81..3fde6610d314 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -661,7 +661,6 @@ static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *do_host_cpuid(struct
>> kvm_cpuid_array *array,
>> case 0x17:
>> case 0x18:
>> case 0x1d:
>> - case 0x1e:
>> case 0x1f:
>> case 0x8000001d:
>> entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
>> @@ -936,21 +935,26 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array
>> *array, u32 function)
>> break;
>> /* Intel AMX TILE */
>> case 0x1d:
>> + entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
>> if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_AMX_TILE)) {
>> - entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
>> + entry->eax = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> + entry->eax = min(entry->eax, 1u);
>> for (i = 1, max_idx = entry->eax; i <= max_idx; ++i) {
>> if (!do_host_cpuid(array, function, i))
>> goto out;
>> }
>> break;
>> - case 0x1e: /* TMUL information */
>> + /* TMUL Information */
>> + case 0x1e:
>> + entry->eax = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
>> if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_AMX_TILE)) {
>> - entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
>> + entry->ebx = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> + entry->ebx &= 0xffffffu;
>> break;
>> case KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE: {
>> const u32 *sigptr = (const u32 *)KVM_SIGNATURE;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists