linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 00/12] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:26:09 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        hsinyi@...omium.org, fshao@...omium.org, moudy.ho@...iatek.com,
        roy-cw.yeh@...iatek.com, CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
        Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
        Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>, nancy.lin@...iatek.com,
        singo.chang@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/12] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for
 mt8195

Il 14/02/22 11:13, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
> Hello Matthias,
> 
> The DRM parts are all reviewed by Chun-Kuang.
> Can you spare some time to give us some suggestion for mmsys parts?
> 
> Or do you think we should separate the driver of mmsys related patches
> to another series and resend again?
> Would it be better to combine mmsys related patches from vdosys0 [1]
> and vdosys1 [2] series?
> 
> e.g.
> [v1,0/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 mmsys support
> [v1,1/7] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add power and gce
> properties
> [v1,2/7] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding
> [v1,3/7] dt-bindings: reset: mt8195: add vdosys1 reset control bit
> [v1,4/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys0
> [v1,5/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1
> [v1,6/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys config API for mt8195
> vdosys1
> [v1,7/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: modify reset controller for MT8195
> vdosys1
> 
> ---
> [1] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195
> -
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=608548
> [2] Add MediaTek SoC DRM (vdosys1) support for mt8195
> -
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=604065
> ---
> 
> Regards,
> Jason-JH.Lin
> 

Hello everyone,

I think that all the drm/mediatek and soc/mediatek patches in this series
are safe and ready (and also tested for regressions on older SoCs).

Feel free to pick them in your trees.

Cheers,
Angelo