lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:31:33 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, markgross@...nel.org
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: huawei-wmi: check the return value of
 device_create_file()

Hi,

On 2/25/22 14:04, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The function device_create_file() in huawei_wmi_battery_add() can fail,
> so its return value should be checked.
> 
> Fixes: 355a070b09ab ("platform/x86: huawei-wmi: Add battery charging thresholds")
> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>

Please run check-patch.pl your patches before submitting them.


> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/huawei-wmi.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/huawei-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/huawei-wmi.c
> index a2d846c4a7ee..2ffd3840f3e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/huawei-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/huawei-wmi.c
> @@ -470,10 +470,19 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(charge_control_thresholds);
>  
>  static int huawei_wmi_battery_add(struct power_supply *battery)
>  {
> -	device_create_file(&battery->dev, &dev_attr_charge_control_start_threshold);
> -	device_create_file(&battery->dev, &dev_attr_charge_control_end_threshold);
> +	int err = 0; 

There needs to be an empty line here,
> +	err = device_create_file(&battery->dev, 
> +						&dev_attr_charge_control_start_threshold);

Why the weird continuation of the call on another line? Please make this a single line.

> +	if (err)
> +		return err;

Empty line here.

> +	err = device_create_file(&battery->dev, 
> +						&dev_attr_charge_control_end_threshold);

Please make this a single line.

> +	if (err) {
> +		device_remove_file(&battery->dev, 
> +						&dev_attr_charge_control_start_threshold);
> +	}

No need for {} here.

>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static int huawei_wmi_battery_remove(struct power_supply *battery)

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ