linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/1] tty: n_gsm: improve standard compliance and feature completeness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yh+GaDd5UlB/D5Ll@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:59:52 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
Cc:     "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] tty: n_gsm: improve standard compliance and feature
 completeness

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:47:20PM +0000, Starke, Daniel wrote:
> Thank you for this quick response.
> 
> > I'm sorry, but there is nothing we can do with such a large patch here at
> > all.
> > 
> > Please break this up into "one logical change per patch" and we will be
> > glad to review it.
> 
> You are absolutely right but this is still work in progress. The attached
> patch was only for reference for all those who would like to look at the
> changes in detail or try out the proposed work. This was not a request for
> code review yet. Also, it seems that the patch was too large for the
> linux-serial mailing list so I have uploaded it here for reference:
> https://github.com/siemens/linux/tree/dstarke-siemens/n_gsm_rfc

You need to provide a set of patches for people to review.  Random code
dumps and random github links are impossible to review cleanly, would
you want to to so?

thanks,

greg k-h