[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoe1BmQBzmd0uXYTdOEZU21wFtUDyU0vAq8+yzqJhKpzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:31:33 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Ben Chuang <benchuanggli@...il.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
greg.tu@...esyslogic.com.tw,
Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw>,
SeanHY.Chen@...esyslogic.com.tw,
Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@...uturecenter.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci-gli: Add runtime PM for GL9763E
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 12:56, Ben Chuang <benchuanggli@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:04 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 03:10, Ben Chuang <benchuanggli@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 6:05 PM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 28/02/2022 19:03, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 13:56, Ben Chuang <benchuanggli@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> From: Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Add runtime PM for GL9763E and disable PLL in runtime suspend. So power
> > > > >> gated of upstream port can be enabled.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw>
> > > > >> Tested-by: Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@...uturecenter.com>
> > > > >> ---
> > > > >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> > > > >> index 97035d77c18c..cf99b6af792d 100644
> > > > >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> > > > >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> > > > >> @@ -873,6 +873,55 @@ static void gli_set_gl9763e(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> > > > >> pci_write_config_dword(pdev, PCIE_GLI_9763E_VHS, value);
> > > > >> }
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > > >> +static int gl9763e_runtime_suspend(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
> > > > >> +{
> > > > >> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = chip->slots[0];
> > > > >> + struct sdhci_host *host = slot->host;
> > > > >> + u16 clock;
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + clock = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > > >> + clock &= ~(SDHCI_CLOCK_PLL_EN | SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN);
> > > > >> + sdhci_writew(host, clock, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + return 0;
> > > > >> +}
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> +static int gl9763e_runtime_resume(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
> > > > >> +{
> > > > >> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = chip->slots[0];
> > > > >> + struct sdhci_host *host = slot->host;
> > > > >> + ktime_t timeout;
> > > > >> + u16 clock;
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + clock = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + clock |= SDHCI_CLOCK_PLL_EN;
> > > > >> + clock &= ~SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE;
> > > > >> + sdhci_writew(host, clock, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + timeout = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 150);
> > > > >> + while (1) {
> > > > >> + bool timedout = ktime_after(ktime_get(), timeout);
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + clock = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > > >> + if (clock & SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE)
> > > > >> + break;
> > > > >> + if (timedout) {
> > > > >> + pr_err("%s: PLL clock never stabilised.\n",
> > > > >> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> > > > >> + sdhci_dumpregs(host);
> > > > >> + break;
> > > > >> + }
> > > > >> + udelay(10);
> > > > >> + }
> > > >
> > > > Could use something like read_poll_timeout() here e.g.
> > > >
> > > > if (read_poll_timeout(sdhci_readw, clk, (clk & SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE),
> > > > 1000, 150000, false, host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL)) {
> > > > pr_err("%s: PLL clock never stabilised.\n",
> > > > mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> > > > sdhci_dumpregs(host);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the tip. I will prepare the next patch.
> > >
> > > > >> + clock |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> > > > >> + sdhci_writew(host, clock, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > > >> +
> > > > >> + return 0;
> > > > >> +}
> > > > >
> > > > > Both functions above look very similar to what sdhci_set_clock() does.
> > > > > Can you use that, rather than open coding the above?
> > > > >
> > >
> > > The codes turn on/off the clock but it doesn't change the clock.
> > > Using sdhci_set_clock() needs to store the clock value because it
> > > clears the clock.
> >
> > Well, in that case at least you can call sdhci_enable_clk() from
> > gl9763e_runtime_resume(), rather than open coding it (the code looks
> > like a direct copy of that code). All you need is to give the
> > sdhci_enable_clk() the correct "clk" as in-parameter.
> >
>
> I want to explain a little more,
> gl9763e is used as a boot disk controller.
> In gl9763e_runtime_suspend(), gl9763e still needs the internal clock to keep states.
> So gl9763e_runtime_suspend() only clears SDHCI_CLOCK_PLL_EN and SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN.
> The SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN is still one (1) In runtime suspend,
>
> If using sdhci_enable_clk() in gl9763e_runtime_resume(), sdhci_enable_clk()
> only fills one (1) to this bit (SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN) again, it cannot cause internal stable bit
> (SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE) to one for gl9763e in the first while loop.
Okay, I get it now, thanks for clarifying.
In any case, the loop in sdhci_enable_clk() that polls the
SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL register to see if the SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE is
set, could perhaps be split out to a function that you can use here as
well.
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists