Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:08:04 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] mm/thp: fix NR_FILE_MAPPED accounting in page_*_file_rmap()

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:46 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> NR_FILE_MAPPED accounting in mm/rmap.c (for /proc/meminfo "Mapped" and
> /proc/vmstat "nr_mapped" and the memcg's memory.stat "mapped_file") is
> slightly flawed for file or shmem huge pages.
>
> It is well thought out, and looks convincing, but there's a racy case
> when the careful counting in page_remove_file_rmap() (without page lock)
> gets discarded.  So that in a workload like two "make -j20" kernel builds
> under memory pressure, with cc1 on hugepage text, "Mapped" can easily
> grow by a spurious 5MB or more on each iteration, ending up implausibly
> bigger than most other numbers in /proc/meminfo.  And, hypothetically,
> might grow to the point of seriously interfering in mm/vmscan.c's
> heuristics, which do take NR_FILE_MAPPED into some consideration.
>
> Fixed by moving the __mod_lruvec_page_state() down to where it will not
> be missed before return (and I've grown a bit tired of that oft-repeated
> but-not-everywhere comment on the __ness: it gets lost in the move here).
>
> Does page_add_file_rmap() need the same change?  I suspect not, because
> page lock is held in all relevant cases, and its skipping case looks safe;
> but it's much easier to be sure, if we do make the same change.
>
> Fixes: dd78fedde4b9 ("rmap: support file thp")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>

> ---
> If this were thought serious enough to backport (I don't feel strongly,
> but it is something I keep in my own trees), it needs a little more care
> near "out", because the mm/munlock series has removed some action there.
>
>  mm/rmap.c | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1238,14 +1238,14 @@ void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
>  void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page,
>         struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool compound)
>  {
> -       int i, nr = 1;
> +       int i, nr = 0;
>
>         VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound && !PageTransHuge(page), page);
>         lock_page_memcg(page);
>         if (compound && PageTransHuge(page)) {
>                 int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
>
> -               for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> +               for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>                         if (atomic_inc_and_test(&page[i]._mapcount))
>                                 nr++;
>                 }
> @@ -1262,11 +1262,12 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page,
>                         VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageLocked(page));
>                         SetPageDoubleMap(compound_head(page));
>                 }
> -               if (!atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount))
> -                       goto out;
> +               if (atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount))
> +                       nr++;
>         }
> -       __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_MAPPED, nr);
>  out:
> +       if (nr)
> +               __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_MAPPED, nr);
>         unlock_page_memcg(page);
>
>         mlock_vma_page(page, vma, compound);
> @@ -1274,7 +1275,7 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page,
>
>  static void page_remove_file_rmap(struct page *page, bool compound)
>  {
> -       int i, nr = 1;
> +       int i, nr = 0;
>
>         VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound && !PageHead(page), page);
>
> @@ -1289,12 +1290,12 @@ static void page_remove_file_rmap(struct page *page, bool compound)
>         if (compound && PageTransHuge(page)) {
>                 int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
>
> -               for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> +               for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>                         if (atomic_add_negative(-1, &page[i]._mapcount))
>                                 nr++;
>                 }
>                 if (!atomic_add_negative(-1, compound_mapcount_ptr(page)))
> -                       return;
> +                       goto out;
>                 if (PageSwapBacked(page))
>                         __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_PMDMAPPED,
>                                                 -nr_pages);
> @@ -1302,16 +1303,12 @@ static void page_remove_file_rmap(struct page *page, bool compound)
>                         __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_PMDMAPPED,
>                                                 -nr_pages);
>         } else {
> -               if (!atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount))
> -                       return;
> +               if (atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount))
> +                       nr++;
>         }
> -
> -       /*
> -        * We use the irq-unsafe __{inc|mod}_lruvec_page_state because
> -        * these counters are not modified in interrupt context, and
> -        * pte lock(a spinlock) is held, which implies preemption disabled.
> -        */
> -       __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_MAPPED, -nr);
> +out:
> +       if (nr)
> +               __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_MAPPED, -nr);
>  }
>
>  static void page_remove_anon_compound_rmap(struct page *page)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists