[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 22:32:48 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pei.lee.ling@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: Resolve poor line rate after
switching from TSO off to TSO on
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 19:15:58 +0800 Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> From: Ling Pei Lee <pei.lee.ling@...el.com>
>
> Sequential execution of these steps:
> i) TSO ON – iperf3 execution,
> ii) TSO OFF – iperf3 execution,
> iii) TSO ON – iperf3 execution, it leads to iperf3 0 bytes transfer.
IMHO the iperf output can be dropped from the commit message,
it doesn't add much beyond this description.
> Clear mss in TDES and call stmmac_enable_tso() to indicate
> a new TSO transmission when it is enabled from TSO off using
> ethtool command
How does the TSO get disabled I don't see any ...enable_tso(, 0, )
calls in the driver? And why call enable in fix_features rather
than set_features?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists