lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HK2PR04MB38913077A55A6E7124A41A4281049@HK2PR04MB3891.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:08:04 +0000
From:   "Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>
To:     "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" 
        <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
CC:     "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linkinjeon@...nel.org" <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
        "sj1557.seo@...sung.com" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] exfat: do not clear VolumeDirty in writeback

Hi, Kohada.Tetsuhiro

> >(PS: The original logic is to clear VolumeDirty after BitMap, FAT and directory
> entries are updated.)
> 
> However, the writing order was not guaranteed.
> More synchronous writes are needed to guarantee the write order.

If "dirsync" or "sync" is enabled, BitMap, FAT and directory entries are guaranteed to be written in order.
This is the reason to keep clearing VolumeDirty.


Best Regards,
Yuezhang Mo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists