[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:14:42 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only obsolete roots if a root
shadow page is zapped
On 3/2/22 23:53, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> index c5e3f219803e..7899ca4748c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> @@ -3857,6 +3857,9 @@ static void svm_load_mmu_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> hpa_t root_hpa,
>> unsigned long cr3;
>>
>> if (npt_enabled) {
>> + if (is_tdp_mmu_root(root_hpa))
>> + svm->current_vmcb->asid_generation = 0;
>> +
>> svm->vmcb->control.nested_cr3 = __sme_set(root_hpa);
>> vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_NPT);
>>
>> Why not just new_asid
> My mental coin flip came up tails? new_asid() is definitely more intuitive.
>
Can you submit a patch (seems like 5.17+stable material)?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists