[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:42:44 +0100
From: Mark Cilissen <mark@...suba.nl>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / x86: Work around broken XSDT on Advantech
DAC-BJ01 board
> On 3 Mar 4 Reiwa, at 14:38, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
Hi Hans,
> On 3/2/22 21:20, Mark Cilissen wrote:
>>>
>
> I think that there are a lot more boards that will have
> DMI_BIOS_VENDOR == "Phoenix Technologies LTD"
> then that there are boards that will have
> DMI_PRODUCT_NAME == "Bearlake CRB Board"
>
> So if you want to make the DMI match as specific as possible then
> IMHO dropping the bios-vendor match is best.
Of course, but just to clarify -- my proposal above is to drop
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "NEC”),
not
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Bearlake CRB Board”),
. :-)
Thanks and regards,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists