linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] sched/fair: Consider cpu affinity when allowing NUMA imbalance in find_idlest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:15:22 +0530
From:   K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com, efault@....de,
        gautham.shenoy@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com,
        srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, valentin.schneider@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched/fair: Consider cpu affinity when allowing NUMA
 imbalance in find_idlest_group

Hello Mel,

On 2/22/2022 6:57 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> [..snip..]
> Only minor nit would that the cpumask can be declared within the if
> block to limit scope but that is just being picky so
Small oversight on my part. I'll wait for Peter's response on the
same and create a v6 if necessary.
Peter, any thoughts?
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>

Thanks for the ack :)

--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek