[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304175733.zoik2fqpizygnlq7@treble>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:57:33 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/39] x86/ibt: Add IBT feature, MSR and #CP handling
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:23:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +bool ibt_selftest(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long ret;
> +
> + asm (" lea ibt_selftest_ip(%%rip), %%rax\n\t"
> + ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
> + " jmp *%%rax\n\t"
> + ASM_REACHABLE
> + ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> + "ibt_selftest_ip: nop\n\t"
Maybe pedantic, but I find the annotations to be less surprising if they
come after the label:
"ibt_selftest_ip:\n\t"
ASM_REACHABLE
ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
"nop\n\t"
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists