lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeT3LbdbSaiwcC2YW40LnA2h8ADtGva-CKU_xh8Edi0nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 20:46:08 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/bits.h: fix -Wtype-limits warnings in GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK()

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 7:36 PM Vincent Mailhol
<mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>

> This pattern is harmless but because it occurs in header files
> (example find_first_bit() from linux/find.h [1]) and because of the
> include hell, the macro GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() is accountable for 31%
> (164714/532484) of all warnings when compiling all modules at W=2
> level.

Have you fixed W=1 warnings?
Without fixing W=1 (which makes much more sense, when used with
WERROR=y && COMPILE_TEST=y) this has no value.

NAK.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ