[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13ad4ba1-2a88-9459-3995-70af36aba33e@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:50:08 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: don't have to lock page anymore when splitting
PMD
On 04.03.22 19:30, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:06 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This probably bounces on the list due to html junk from the gmail app.
>>
>> What happened to
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220131162940.210846-10-david@redhat.com/
>>
>> Included in the very series mentioned below?
>>
>> Was this silently dropped due to folio conversion collisions? :/
>
> I really didn't notice you already proposed this. Maybe folio
> conversion, maybe mlock cleanup, I can't tell. But anyway this patch
> needs to get rebased. I will submit v2 to solve the comment, will add
> your signed-off-by.
>
Why a rebase? The folio change comes via another tree (unfortunately not
Andrews tree, I wish we would have a single MM tree for MM patches).
@Andrew, the last mail I received was
+ mm-huge_memory-remove-stale-locking-logic-from-__split_huge_pmd.patch
added to -mm tree
The patch shows up in mmotm as
#[merged]mm-huge_memory-remove-stale-locking-logic-from-__split_huge_pmd.patch
... which shouldn't be true.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists