[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABWYdi0t6W4269g5OMLuLG=SWESDDEDPF-1kv1OKnzua=6=mBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:53:20 -0800
From: Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Frank Hofmann <fhofmann@...udflare.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Dao <dqminh@...udflare.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: sync flush only if periodic flush is delayed
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:40 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Daniel Dao has reported [1] a regression on workloads that may trigger
> a lot of refaults (anon and file). The underlying issue is that flushing
> rstat is expensive. Although rstat flush are batched with (nr_cpus *
> MEMCG_BATCH) stat updates, it seems like there are workloads which
> genuinely do stat updates larger than batch value within short amount of
> time. Since the rstat flush can happen in the performance critical
> codepaths like page faults, such workload can suffer greatly.
>
> This patch fixes this regression by making the rstat flushing
> conditional in the performance critical codepaths. More specifically,
> the kernel relies on the async periodic rstat flusher to flush the stats
> and only if the periodic flusher is delayed by more than twice the
> amount of its normal time window then the kernel allows rstat flushing
> from the performance critical codepaths.
>
> Now the question: what are the side-effects of this change? The worst
> that can happen is the refault codepath will see 4sec old lruvec stats
> and may cause false (or missed) activations of the refaulted page which
> may under-or-overestimate the workingset size. Though that is not very
> concerning as the kernel can already miss or do false activations.
>
> There are two more codepaths whose flushing behavior is not changed by
> this patch and we may need to come to them in future. One is the
> writeback stats used by dirty throttling and second is the deactivation
> heuristic in the reclaim. For now keeping an eye on them and if there is
> report of regression due to these codepaths, we will reevaluate then.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+wXwBSyO87ZX5PVwdHm-=dBjZYECGmfnydUicUyrQqndgX2MQ@mail.gmail.com [1]
> Fixes: 1f828223b799 ("memcg: flush lruvec stats in the refault")
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Daniel Dao <dqminh@...udflare.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
See my testing results here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CABWYdi2usrWOnOnmKYYvuFpE=yJmgtq4a7u6FiGJGJkskv+eVQ@mail.gmail.com/
Tested-by: Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists