[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220303235937-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 00:00:25 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared
whilst still in use
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:54:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() already holds the mutex during its call
> to vhost_get_vq_desc(). All we have to do is take the same lock
> during virtqueue clean-up and we mitigate the reported issues.
>
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=279432d30d825e63ba00
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
So combine with the warning patch and update description with
the comment I posted, explaining it's more a just in case thing.
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 59edb5a1ffe28..bbaff6a5e21b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> + mutex_lock(&dev->vqs[i]->mutex);
> if (dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx)
> eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx);
> if (dev->vqs[i]->kick)
> @@ -700,6 +701,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> if (dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx)
> eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx);
> vhost_vq_reset(dev, dev->vqs[i]);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->vqs[i]->mutex);
> }
> vhost_dev_free_iovecs(dev);
> if (dev->log_ctx)
> --
> 2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists