[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304203839.GQ11184@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 21:38:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/39] x86/ibt: Add IBT feature, MSR and #CP handling
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:57:33AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:23:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +bool ibt_selftest(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long ret;
> > +
> > + asm (" lea ibt_selftest_ip(%%rip), %%rax\n\t"
> > + ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
> > + " jmp *%%rax\n\t"
> > + ASM_REACHABLE
> > + ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> > + "ibt_selftest_ip: nop\n\t"
>
> Maybe pedantic, but I find the annotations to be less surprising if they
> come after the label:
>
> "ibt_selftest_ip:\n\t"
> ASM_REACHABLE
> ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> "nop\n\t"
Done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists