[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304210334.pmrhhcm5okzcr5cd@treble>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 13:03:34 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/39] x86/ibt,ftrace: Make function-graph play nice
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 08:48:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:51:54AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:23:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > +
> > > + addq $16, %rsp
> > > + ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
> > > + call .Ldo_rop
> > > + int3
> > > +.Ldo_rop:
> > > + mov %rdi, (%rsp)
> > > + UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> > > + RET
> >
> > Why the int3?
>
> Speculation trap :-) Either I'm too paranoid or not paranoid enough; but
> without it it's just too close to a retpoline and it doesn't feel right.
Um, it *is* a retpoline :-)
Can you just use the RETPOLINE macro? Along with a comment stating why
it can't just do a JMP_NOSPEC?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists