linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: Fix missing ARRAY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 13:58:11 -0800
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: Fix missing ARRAY_SIZE() check

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 1:47 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 23:23, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Fixes: f6d62d091cfd ("drm/msm/a6xx: add support for Adreno 660 GPU")
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> However see the comment below.
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > index 02b47977b5c3..6406d8c3411a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static void a6xx_set_cp_protect(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >
> >         BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_protect) > 32);
> >         BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a650_protect) > 48);
> > +       BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a660_protect) > 48);
>
> The magic number 32 and 48 are repeated through this code. I'd suggest
> to define them and use defined names.
> It can come up as a separate commit.
>

Or perhaps instead:
----
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 6406d8c3411a..58c371930fb4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -683,20 +683,23 @@ static void a6xx_set_cp_protect(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 {
        struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
        const u32 *regs = a6xx_protect;
-       unsigned i, count = ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_protect), count_max = 32;
-
-       BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_protect) > 32);
-       BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a650_protect) > 48);
-       BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a660_protect) > 48);
+       unsigned i, count, count_max;

        if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) {
                regs = a650_protect;
                count = ARRAY_SIZE(a650_protect);
                count_max = 48;
+               BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a650_protect) > 48);
        } else if (adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu)) {
                regs = a660_protect;
                count = ARRAY_SIZE(a660_protect);
                count_max = 48;
+               BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a660_protect) > 48);
+       } else {
+               regs = a6xx_protect;
+               count = ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_protect);
+               count_max = 32;
+               BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_protect) > 32);
        }

        /*
----

that moves each of the two uses of constant together..  adding three
#defines each used only twice seems a bit silly, IMHO

BR,
-R