linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 21:22:50 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Konrad Wilhelm Kleine <kkleine@...hat.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, kashyap.desai@...adcom.com,
        sumit.saxena@...adcom.com, shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

On 3/3/22 15:38, Joe Perches wrote:
> One argument is that churn leads to difficulty in backporting
> fixes to older 'stable' versions.
> 
> I think the churn argument is overstated.

I'm often backporting patches to older kernels and I think the churn argument 
has not been emphasized enough. Backporting patches is a normal aspect of a 
product lifecycle since a kernel version is chosen when development of a 
product starts and bugfixes are cherry-picked from upstream selectively.

Thanks,

Bart.