linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/a6xx: Zap counters across context switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220304005317.776110-5-robdclark@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu,  3 Mar 2022 16:52:17 -0800
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
        Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/a6xx: Zap counters across context switch

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>

Any app controlled perfcntr collection (GL_AMD_performance_monitor, etc)
does not require counters to maintain state across context switches.  So
clear them if systemwide profiling is not active.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 237c2e7a7baa..02b47977b5c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void get_stats_counter(struct msm_ringbuffer *ring, u32 counter,
 static void a6xx_set_pagetable(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
 		struct msm_ringbuffer *ring, struct msm_file_private *ctx)
 {
+	bool sysprof = refcount_read(&a6xx_gpu->base.base.sysprof_active) > 1;
 	phys_addr_t ttbr;
 	u32 asid;
 	u64 memptr = rbmemptr(ring, ttbr0);
@@ -111,6 +112,15 @@ static void a6xx_set_pagetable(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
 	if (msm_iommu_pagetable_params(ctx->aspace->mmu, &ttbr, &asid))
 		return;
 
+	if (!sysprof) {
+		/* Turn off protected mode to write to special registers */
+		OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_SET_PROTECTED_MODE, 1);
+		OUT_RING(ring, 0);
+
+		OUT_PKT4(ring, REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_SRAM_INIT_CMD, 1);
+		OUT_RING(ring, 1);
+	}
+
 	/* Execute the table update */
 	OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_SMMU_TABLE_UPDATE, 4);
 	OUT_RING(ring, CP_SMMU_TABLE_UPDATE_0_TTBR0_LO(lower_32_bits(ttbr)));
@@ -137,6 +147,25 @@ static void a6xx_set_pagetable(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
 
 	OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_EVENT_WRITE, 1);
 	OUT_RING(ring, 0x31);
+
+	if (!sysprof) {
+		/*
+		 * Wait for SRAM clear after the pgtable update, so the
+		 * two can happen in parallel:
+		 */
+		OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM, 6);
+		OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_0_FUNCTION(WRITE_EQ));
+		OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_1_POLL_ADDR_LO(
+				REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_SRAM_INIT_STATUS));
+		OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_2_POLL_ADDR_HI(0));
+		OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_3_REF(0x1));
+		OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_4_MASK(0x1));
+		OUT_RING(ring, CP_WAIT_REG_MEM_5_DELAY_LOOP_CYCLES(0));
+
+		/* Re-enable protected mode: */
+		OUT_PKT7(ring, CP_SET_PROTECTED_MODE, 1);
+		OUT_RING(ring, 1);
+	}
 }
 
 static void a6xx_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_gem_submit *submit)
-- 
2.35.1