[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304093409.25829-11-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 17:34:03 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <shy828301@...il.com>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <ying.huang@...el.com>, <ziy@...dia.com>,
<minchan@...nel.org>, <apopple@...dia.com>,
<ave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <o451686892@...il.com>,
<almasrymina@...gle.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<rcampbell@...dia.com>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <riel@...hat.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/16] mm/migration: remove PG_writeback handle in folio_migrate_flags
When newfolio reaches here, it's guaranteed that PG_writeback is not set
because caller ensures writeback must have been completed. Remove this
unneeded check and cleanup the relevant comment.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/migrate.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index cb970d201147..1de5289a4af0 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -549,18 +549,6 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
if (!folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
folio->private = NULL;
- /*
- * If any waiters have accumulated on the new page then
- * wake them up.
- */
- if (folio_test_writeback(newfolio))
- folio_end_writeback(newfolio);
-
- /*
- * PG_readahead shares the same bit with PG_reclaim. The above
- * end_page_writeback() may clear PG_readahead mistakenly, so set the
- * bit after that.
- */
if (folio_test_readahead(folio))
folio_set_readahead(newfolio);
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists