Message-ID: <YiFYTcFk+NYCtuZR@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 00:07:41 +0000
From:   Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP
 MMU root shadow page

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> 
> Add a dedicated helper for zapping a TDP MMU root, and use it in the three
> flows that do "zap_all" and intentionally do not do a TLB flush if SPTEs
> are zapped (zapping an entire root is safe if and only if it cannot be in
> use by any vCPU).  Because a TLB flush is never required, unconditionally
> pass "false" to tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() when potentially yielding.
> 
> Opportunistically document why KVM must not yield when zapping roots that
> are being zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), i.e. roots whose refcount has
> reached zero, and further harden the flow to detect improper KVM behavior
> with respect to roots that are supposed to be unreachable.
> 
> In addition to hardening zapping of roots, isolating zapping of roots
> will allow future simplification of zap_gfn_range() by having it zap only
> leaf SPTEs, and by removing its tricky "zap all" heuristic.  By having
> all paths that truly need to free _all_ SPs flow through the dedicated
> root zapper, the generic zapper can be freed of those concerns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
> Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-16-seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index f59f3ff5cb75..970376297b30 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	rcu_barrier();
>  }
>  
> -static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> -			  gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
> -			  bool shared);
> -
>  static void tdp_mmu_free_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  {
>  	free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
> @@ -82,6 +78,9 @@ static void tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
>  	tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
>  }
>  
> +static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> +			     bool shared);
> +
>  void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  			  bool shared)
>  {
> @@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  	 * intermediate paging structures, that may be zapped, as such entries
>  	 * are associated with the ASID on both VMX and SVM.
>  	 */
> -	(void)zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, -1ull, false, false, shared);
> +	tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared);
>  
>  	call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
>  }
> @@ -737,6 +736,76 @@ static inline bool __must_check tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	return iter->yielded;
>  }
>  
> +static inline gfn_t tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Bound TDP MMU walks at host.MAXPHYADDR, guest accesses beyond that
> +	 * will hit a #PF(RSVD) and never hit an EPT Violation/Misconfig / #NPF,
> +	 * and so KVM will never install a SPTE for such addresses.
> +	 */
> +	return 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
> +}
> +
> +static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
> +			     bool shared)
> +{
> +	bool root_is_unreachable = !refcount_read(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count);
> +	struct tdp_iter iter;
> +
> +	gfn_t end = tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host();
> +	gfn_t start = 0;
> +
> +	kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * No need to try to step down in the iterator when zapping an entire
> +	 * root, zapping an upper-level SPTE will recurse on its children.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root, root->role.level, start, end) {
> +retry:
> +		/*
> +		 * Yielding isn't allowed when zapping an unreachable root as
> +		 * the root won't be processed by mmu_notifier callbacks.  When
> +		 * handling an unmap/release mmu_notifier command, KVM must
> +		 * drop all references to relevant pages prior to completing
> +		 * the callback.  Dropping mmu_lock can result in zapping SPTEs
> +		 * for an unreachable root after a relevant callback completes,
> +		 * which leads to use-after-free as zapping a SPTE triggers
> +		 * "writeback" of dirty/accessed bits to the SPTE's associated
> +		 * struct page.
> +		 */
> +		if (!root_is_unreachable &&
> +		    tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, shared))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!shared) {
> +			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
> +		} else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * cmpxchg() shouldn't fail if the root is unreachable.
> +			 * Retry so as not to leak the page and its children.
> +			 */
> +			WARN_ONCE(root_is_unreachable,
> +				  "Contended TDP MMU SPTE in unreachable root.");
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * WARN if the root is invalid and is unreachable, all SPTEs
> +		 * should've been zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(),
> +		 * and inserting new SPTEs under an invalid root is a KVM bug.
> +		 */
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(root_is_unreachable && root->role.invalid);
> +	}
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
>  bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  {
>  	u64 old_spte;
> @@ -785,8 +854,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  			  gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
>  			  bool shared)
>  {
> -	gfn_t max_gfn_host = 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	bool zap_all = (start == 0 && end >= max_gfn_host);
> +	bool zap_all = (start == 0 && end >= tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host());
>  	struct tdp_iter iter;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -795,12 +863,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  	 */
>  	int min_level = zap_all ? root->role.level : PG_LEVEL_4K;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Bound the walk at host.MAXPHYADDR, guest accesses beyond that will
> -	 * hit a #PF(RSVD) and never get to an EPT Violation/Misconfig / #NPF,
> -	 * and so KVM will never install a SPTE for such addresses.
> -	 */
> -	end = min(end, max_gfn_host);
> +	end = min(end, tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host());
>  
>  	kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
>  
> @@ -860,6 +923,7 @@ bool __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t start,
>  
>  void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> +	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -867,8 +931,10 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	 * is being destroyed or the userspace VMM has exited.  In both cases,
>  	 * KVM_RUN is unreachable, i.e. no vCPUs will ever service the request.
>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++)
> -		(void)kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, i, 0, -1ull, false);
> +	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
> +		for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, i)
> +			tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, false);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static struct kvm_mmu_page *next_invalidated_root(struct kvm *kvm,
> @@ -925,7 +991,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		 * will still flush on yield, but that's a minor performance
>  		 * blip and not a functional issue.
>  		 */
> -		(void)zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, -1ull, true, false, true);
> +		tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, true);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Put the reference acquired in
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists