linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] usb: typec: anx7411: Add Analogix PD ANX7411 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:28:40 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        bliang@...logixsemi.com, qwen@...logixsemi.com,
        jli@...logixsemi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] usb: typec: anx7411: Add Analogix PD ANX7411
 support

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:29:36AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:13:33PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:47:57AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:03:18PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > This does not apply on top of Greg's latest usb-next branch. You need
> > > > to rebase this. There are also a few more nitpicks below.
> > > 
> > > Hi, I didn't found tcpci.h in include/linux/usb/
> > 
> > I'm asking you to create the file.
> > 
> > So create a separate patch where you move the register definitions and
> > command definitions from drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h to
> > include/linux/usb/tcpci.h
> Hi heikki, I'm confused, do you mean move total tcpci.h to
> include/linux/usb/ directory or just move our driver patch used register
> definitions and command to "include/linux/usb/tcpci.h"?
> 
> And I think the other way is, our driver patch just include
> "tcpm/tcpci.h" is better(no need to create new file). What do you think?

I would prefer that you just introduce the global header for them.

thanks,

-- 
heikki