[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiIF+PpuIeJMY+/T@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:28:40 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
bliang@...logixsemi.com, qwen@...logixsemi.com,
jli@...logixsemi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] usb: typec: anx7411: Add Analogix PD ANX7411
support
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:29:36AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:13:33PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:47:57AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:03:18PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This does not apply on top of Greg's latest usb-next branch. You need
> > > > to rebase this. There are also a few more nitpicks below.
> > >
> > > Hi, I didn't found tcpci.h in include/linux/usb/
> >
> > I'm asking you to create the file.
> >
> > So create a separate patch where you move the register definitions and
> > command definitions from drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h to
> > include/linux/usb/tcpci.h
> Hi heikki, I'm confused, do you mean move total tcpci.h to
> include/linux/usb/ directory or just move our driver patch used register
> definitions and command to "include/linux/usb/tcpci.h"?
>
> And I think the other way is, our driver patch just include
> "tcpm/tcpci.h" is better(no need to create new file). What do you think?
I would prefer that you just introduce the global header for them.
thanks,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists