[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiIuhYVpgkzVwtAi@lahna>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 17:21:41 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@...il.com>,
Benoit Grégoire <benoitg@...us.ca>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/PCI: Clip only partial E820 overlaps
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:15:16PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 3/4/22 04:51, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >
> > This is based on Hans' extensive debugging and patch at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220228105259.230903-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
> > and applies on 7e57714cd0ad ("Linux 5.17-rc6").
> >
> > This is basically the same idea (applying the 4dc2287c1805 workaround only
> > when an E820 region *partially* overlaps a host bridge window), but I think
> > it's a little simpler.
> >
> > This also adds a little dmesg output when clipping, which should make
> > future debugging easier.
> >
> > I bcc'd several folks who didn't have public email addresses in the RedHat
> > bugzilla or Launchpad. If you review or test this, I'd be happy to
> > acknowledge that.
> >
> > Bjorn Helgaas (3):
> > x86/PCI: Eliminate remove_e820_regions() common subexpressions
> > x86/PCI: Log host bridge window clipping for E820 regions
> > x86/PCI: Preserve host bridge windows completely covered by E820
>
> Thanks, I agree that this is better then my fix I also like the logging
> added to 2/3 which lets us know if the commit 4dc2287c1805 workaround
> is active.
>
> I have one small remark on 3/3. Regardless of that getting addressed
> the entire series is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Looks good to me too :)
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists