[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34833549a995fa3325f4ceb9b42cd01de0921c14.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:55:06 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/osnoise: Force quiescent states while tracing
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 16:37 +0100, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 3/4/22 16:28, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Some comments:
> > - You're not exiting/entering EQS on IRQ/NMI entry/exit. See
> > irqentry_{enter,exit}() and irqentry_nmi_{enter,exit}().
>
> hummm, right!
>
> > - See this series[1], if we ever pursue this approach, it's important we got
> > through context tracking, instead of poking at RCU directly.
>
> I had a test patch with context_tracking as well... entering and leaving using
> it. Lemme find it.... but it basically works in the same way as for RCU (or
> pretend to work).
Yes, agree, it's fundamentally the same.
--
Nicolás Sáenz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists