lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMhUBjm9+nt8j0JFwHEms2Ra1YjhAXquVyHuDYX0_ZZzJyNuZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 5 Mar 2022 22:11:48 +0800
From:   Zheyu Ma <zheyuma97@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] net: macb: Use-After-Free when removing the module

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:57 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 20:24:53 +0800 Zheyu Ma wrote:
> > When removing the macb_pci module, the driver will cause a UAF bug.
> >
> > Commit d82d5303c4c5 ("net: macb: fix use after free on rmmod") moves
> > the platform_device_unregister() after clk_unregister(), but this
> > introduces another UAF bug.
>
> The layering is all weird here. macb_probe() should allocate a private
> structure for the _PCI driver_ which it can then attach to
> struct pci_dev *pdev as driver data. Then free it in remove.
> It shouldn't stuff its information into the platform device.
>
> Are you willing to send a fix like that?

Thanks for your useful suggestion, I'm willing to submit a patch.
But I'm a newbie to kernel and I think I need some time to think about
how to make such changes.

Regards,
Zheyu Ma

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ