[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKdAkRQj9fTv-g03__ncNrnyNh5x+4uG2_yioyrc-iFAd22c3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:41:39 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: add devm_clk_prepare_enable() helper
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:32 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 3/4/21 2:12 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > Add a managed wrapper for clk_prepare_enable().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>
> That has been tried several times, including by yours truly,
> and has always been rejected.
>
> Just use devm_add_action_or_reset() like many other watchdog
> drivers.
Can we apply the devm version for crying out loud? I do not see what
benefit there is to force everyone open-code it with
devm_add_action_or_reset(). By simply blocking it we are not making
the kernel better and it's been stalled for a very long time.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists