linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 16/32] x86/sgx: Support restricting of enclave page permissions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YiLWvNxI/v43h+VQ@iki.fi>
Date:   Sat, 5 Mar 2022 05:19:24 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Dhanraj, Vijay" <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
        "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>,
        "Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
        "Shanahan, Mark" <mark.shanahan@...el.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 16/32] x86/sgx: Support restricting of enclave page
 permissions

Sorry, I missed this.

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 01:44:14PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/3/22 13:23, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > Unfortunately MAP_POPULATE is not supported by SGX VMAs because of their
> > VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP flags. When VMAs with such flags obtain this capability
> > then I believe that SGX would benefit.
> 
> Some Intel folks asked for this quite a while ago.  I think it's
> entirely doable: add a new vm_ops->populate() function that will allow
> ignoring VM_IO|VM_PFNMAP if present.

I'm sorry what I don't understand what you mean by ignoring here,
i.e. cannot fully comprehend the last sentece.

And would the vm_ops->populate() be called right after the existing ones
involved with the VMA creation process?

> Or, if nobody wants to waste all of the vm_ops space, just add an
> arch_vma_populate() or something which can call over into SGX.
> 
> I'll happily review the patches if anyone can put such a beast together.

I'll start with vm_ops->populate() and check the feedback first for
that.

BR, Jarkko