linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 5 Mar 2022 14:32:53 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Konrad Wilhelm Kleine <kkleine@...hat.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        kashyap.desai@...adcom.com, sumit.saxena@...adcom.com,
        shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Joe Perches wrote:

> 
> Is that statement really disputable?
> 

If there was such a thing as an indisputable statement, a set of 
universally accepted style rules would soon follow, I suspect.

...

> 
> There is no "one true editor".
> There will not be "one true source code formatter" either.
> 

It only has to be sufficiently good that it produces a consensus.