lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiLzTWfo5P1pyxtp@iki.fi>
Date:   Sat, 5 Mar 2022 07:21:17 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>, peterhuewe@....de,
        jgg@...pe.ca, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, David.Laight@...lab.com,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        p.rosenberger@...bus.com,
        Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 01:34:06PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> On 3/3/22 17:45, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:43:53AM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> > > From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
> > > 
> > > The following sequence of operations results in a refcount warning:
> > > 
> > > 1. Open device /dev/tpmrm.
> > > 2. Remove module tpm_tis_spi.
> > > 3. Write a TPM command to the file descriptor opened at step 1.
> > > 
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1161 at lib/refcount.c:25 kobject_get+0xa0/0xa4
> > > refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
> > > Modules linked in: tpm_tis_spi tpm_tis_core tpm mdio_bcm_unimac brcmfmac
> > > sha256_generic libsha256 sha256_arm hci_uart btbcm bluetooth cfg80211 vc4
> > > brcmutil ecdh_generic ecc snd_soc_core crc32_arm_ce libaes
> > > raspberrypi_hwmon ac97_bus snd_pcm_dmaengine bcm2711_thermal snd_pcm
> > > snd_timer genet snd phy_generic soundcore [last unloaded: spi_bcm2835]
> > > CPU: 3 PID: 1161 Comm: hold_open Not tainted 5.10.0ls-main-dirty #2
> > > Hardware name: BCM2711
> > > [<c0410c3c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c040b580>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> > > [<c040b580>] (show_stack) from [<c1092174>] (dump_stack+0xc4/0xd8)
> > > [<c1092174>] (dump_stack) from [<c0445a30>] (__warn+0x104/0x108)
> > > [<c0445a30>] (__warn) from [<c0445aa8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x74/0xb8)
> > > [<c0445aa8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c08435d0>] (kobject_get+0xa0/0xa4)
> > > [<c08435d0>] (kobject_get) from [<bf0a715c>] (tpm_try_get_ops+0x14/0x54 [tpm])
> > > [<bf0a715c>] (tpm_try_get_ops [tpm]) from [<bf0a7d6c>] (tpm_common_write+0x38/0x60 [tpm])
> > > [<bf0a7d6c>] (tpm_common_write [tpm]) from [<c05a7ac0>] (vfs_write+0xc4/0x3c0)
> > > [<c05a7ac0>] (vfs_write) from [<c05a7ee4>] (ksys_write+0x58/0xcc)
> > > [<c05a7ee4>] (ksys_write) from [<c04001a0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x4c)
> > > Exception stack(0xc226bfa8 to 0xc226bff0)
> > > bfa0:                   00000000 000105b4 00000003 beafe664 00000014 00000000
> > > bfc0: 00000000 000105b4 000103f8 00000004 00000000 00000000 b6f9c000 beafe684
> > > bfe0: 0000006c beafe648 0001056c b6eb6944
> > > ---[ end trace d4b8409def9b8b1f ]---
> > > 
> > > The reason for this warning is the attempt to get the chip->dev reference
> > > in tpm_common_write() although the reference counter is already zero.
> > > 
> > > Since commit 8979b02aaf1d ("tpm: Fix reference count to main device") the
> > > extra reference used to prevent a premature zero counter is never taken,
> > > because the required TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 flag is never set.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by moving the TPM 2 character device handling from
> > > tpm_chip_alloc() to tpm_add_char_device() which is called at a later point
> > > in time when the flag has been set in case of TPM2.
> > > 
> > > Commit fdc915f7f719 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm<n>")
> > > already introduced function tpm_devs_release() to release the extra
> > > reference but did not implement the required put on chip->devs that results
> > > in the call of this function.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by putting chip->devs in tpm_chip_unregister().
> > > 
> > > Finally move the new implementation for the TPM 2 handling into a new
> > > function to avoid multiple checks for the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 flag in the
> > > good case and error cases.
> > > 
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Fixes: fdc915f7f719 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm<n>")
> > > Fixes: 8979b02aaf1d ("tpm: Fix reference count to main device")
> > > Co-developed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> > > Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c   | 46 +++++--------------------
> > >   drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h        |  2 ++
> > >   drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > index b009e7479b70..783d65fc71f0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > @@ -274,14 +274,6 @@ static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> > >   	kfree(chip);
> > >   }
> > > -static void tpm_devs_release(struct device *dev)
> > > -{
> > > -	struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(dev, struct tpm_chip, devs);
> > > -
> > > -	/* release the master device reference */
> > > -	put_device(&chip->dev);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >   /**
> > >    * tpm_class_shutdown() - prepare the TPM device for loss of power.
> > >    * @dev: device to which the chip is associated.
> > > @@ -344,7 +336,6 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
> > >   	chip->dev_num = rc;
> > >   	device_initialize(&chip->dev);
> > > -	device_initialize(&chip->devs);
> > >   	chip->dev.class = tpm_class;
> > >   	chip->dev.class->shutdown_pre = tpm_class_shutdown;
> > > @@ -352,29 +343,12 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
> > >   	chip->dev.parent = pdev;
> > >   	chip->dev.groups = chip->groups;
> > > -	chip->devs.parent = pdev;
> > > -	chip->devs.class = tpmrm_class;
> > > -	chip->devs.release = tpm_devs_release;
> > > -	/* get extra reference on main device to hold on
> > > -	 * behalf of devs.  This holds the chip structure
> > > -	 * while cdevs is in use.  The corresponding put
> > > -	 * is in the tpm_devs_release (TPM2 only)
> > > -	 */
> > > -	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > > -		get_device(&chip->dev);
> > > -
> > >   	if (chip->dev_num == 0)
> > >   		chip->dev.devt = MKDEV(MISC_MAJOR, TPM_MINOR);
> > >   	else
> > >   		chip->dev.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(tpm_devt), chip->dev_num);
> > > -	chip->devs.devt =
> > > -		MKDEV(MAJOR(tpm_devt), chip->dev_num + TPM_NUM_DEVICES);
> > > -
> > >   	rc = dev_set_name(&chip->dev, "tpm%d", chip->dev_num);
> > > -	if (rc)
> > > -		goto out;
> > > -	rc = dev_set_name(&chip->devs, "tpmrm%d", chip->dev_num);
> > >   	if (rc)
> > >   		goto out;
> > > @@ -382,9 +356,7 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
> > >   		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL;
> > >   	cdev_init(&chip->cdev, &tpm_fops);
> > > -	cdev_init(&chip->cdevs, &tpmrm_fops);
> > >   	chip->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > > -	chip->cdevs.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > >   	rc = tpm2_init_space(&chip->work_space, TPM2_SPACE_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > >   	if (rc) {
> > > @@ -396,7 +368,6 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
> > >   	return chip;
> > >   out:
> > > -	put_device(&chip->devs);
> > >   	put_device(&chip->dev);
> > >   	return ERR_PTR(rc);
> > >   }
> > > @@ -445,14 +416,9 @@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > >   	}
> > >   	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip)) {
> > > -		rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> > > -		if (rc) {
> > > -			dev_err(&chip->devs,
> > > -				"unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> > > -				dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
> > > -				MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
> > > -			return rc;
> > > -		}
> > > +		rc = tpm_devs_add(chip);
> > > +		if (rc)
> > > +			goto err_del_cdev;
> > >   	}
> > >   	/* Make the chip available. */
> > > @@ -460,6 +426,10 @@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > >   	idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, chip, chip->dev_num);
> > >   	mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +
> > > +err_del_cdev:
> > > +	cdev_device_del(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
> > >   	return rc;
> > >   }
> > > @@ -654,7 +624,7 @@ void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > >   		hwrng_unregister(&chip->hwrng);
> > >   	tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
> > >   	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip))
> > > -		cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> > > +		tpm_devs_remove(chip);
> > >   	tpm_del_char_device(chip);
> > >   }
> > >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_unregister);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > index 283f78211c3a..2163c6ee0d36 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ int tpm2_prepare_space(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space, u8 *cmd,
> > >   		       size_t cmdsiz);
> > >   int tpm2_commit_space(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space, void *buf,
> > >   		      size_t *bufsiz);
> > > +int tpm_devs_add(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > +void tpm_devs_remove(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > >   void tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > >   void tpm_bios_log_teardown(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> > > index 97e916856cf3..265ec72b1d81 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> > > @@ -574,3 +574,68 @@ int tpm2_commit_space(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> > >   	dev_err(&chip->dev, "%s: error %d\n", __func__, rc);
> > >   	return rc;
> > >   }
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Put the reference to the main device.
> > > + */
> > > +static void tpm_devs_release(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(dev, struct tpm_chip, devs);
> > > +
> > > +	/* release the master device reference */
> > > +	put_device(&chip->dev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Remove the device file for exposed TPM spaces and release the device
> > > + * reference. This may also release the reference to the master device.
> > > + */
> > > +void tpm_devs_remove(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > +{
> > > +	cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> > > +	put_device(&chip->devs);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Add a device file to expose TPM spaces. Also take a reference to the
> > > + * main device.
> > > + */
> > > +int tpm_devs_add(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > +{
> > > +	int rc;
> > > +
> > > +	device_initialize(&chip->devs);
> > > +	chip->devs.parent = chip->dev.parent;
> > > +	chip->devs.class = tpmrm_class;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Get extra reference on main device to hold on behalf of devs.
> > > +	 * This holds the chip structure while cdevs is in use. The
> > > +	 * corresponding put is in the tpm_devs_release.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	get_device(&chip->dev);
> > > +	chip->devs.release = tpm_devs_release;
> > > +	chip->devs.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(tpm_devt), chip->dev_num + TPM_NUM_DEVICES);
> > > +	cdev_init(&chip->cdevs, &tpmrm_fops);
> > > +	chip->cdevs.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > > +
> > > +	rc = dev_set_name(&chip->devs, "tpmrm%d", chip->dev_num);
> > > +	if (rc)
> > > +		goto err_put_devs;
> > > +
> > > +	rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> > > +	if (rc) {
> > > +		dev_err(&chip->devs,
> > > +			"unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> > > +			dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
> > > +			MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
> > > +		goto err_put_devs;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +
> > > +err_put_devs:
> > > +	put_device(&chip->devs);
> > > +
> > > +	return rc;
> > > +}
> > > -- 
> > > 2.35.1
> > > 
> > LGTM, thank you.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Stefan, if possible, for sanity check, redo test with v9.
> 
> We need that other patch as well!

Yes.

> Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>

Thank you.

BR, Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ