lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4088205-a344-5ef8-15e2-9ccc5d1691ea@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 16:27:00 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>,
        "D Scott Phillips OS" <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
        <lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
        <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the
 previous __mon_event_count() chunks

Hi James,

On 2/17/2022 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:
> mbm_bw_count() is only called by the mbm_handle_overflow() worker once a
> second. It reads the hardware register, calculates the bandwidth and
> updates m->prev_bw_msr which is used to hold the previous hardware register
> value.
> 
> Operating directly on hardware register values makes it difficult to make
> this code architecture independent, so that it can be moved to /fs/,
> making the mba_sc feature something resctrl supports with no additional
> support from the architecture.
> Prior to calling mbm_bw_count(), mbm_update() reads from the same hardware
> register using __mon_event_count().
> 
> Change mbm_bw_count() to use the current chunks value most recently saved by
> __mon_event_count(). This removes an extra call to __rmid_read().

> Instead of using m->prev_msr to calculate the number of chunks seen,
> use the rr->val that was updated by __mon_event_count(). This removes a extra
> calls to mbm_overflow_count() and get_corrected_mbm_count().

"removes a extra calls" -> "removes an extra call" ?

__mon_event_count() ends with "rr->val += get_corrected_mbm_count()" and
it is called twice by mbm_update(). The intention in this change is for
mbm_bw_count() to benefit from the rmid read done just before ...
but would using rr->val within mbm_bw_count() not result in it getting
data from both rmid reads due to the increment?

mbm_update() {

	rr.val = 0;

	if (is_mbm_total_enabled()) {
		...
		__mon_event_count() /* rr->val += ... */
	}
	if (is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
		...
		__mon_event_count() /* rr->val += ... */

		if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
			mbm_bw_count(rmid, &rr); /* Use rr-> val */
	}


Should rr.val perhaps be reset before each __mon_event_count() call instead of
just at the beginning of mbm_update()?

> Calculating bandwidth like this means mbm_bw_count() no longer operates
> on hardware register values directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
>  * Expanded commit message
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  * This patch was rewritten
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c  | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 3b9e43ba7590..c50c8911ef59 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ struct rftype {
>   * struct mbm_state - status for each MBM counter in each domain
>   * @chunks:	Total data moved (multiply by rdt_group.mon_scale to get bytes)
>   * @prev_msr:	Value of IA32_QM_CTR for this RMID last time we read it
> - * @prev_bw_msr:Value of previous IA32_QM_CTR for bandwidth counting
> + * @prev_bw_chunks: Previous chunks value read when for bandwidth calculation

"value read when for" -> "value read for"?

>   * @prev_bw:	The most recent bandwidth in MBps
>   * @delta_bw:	Difference between the current and previous bandwidth
>   * @delta_comp:	Indicates whether to compute the delta_bw
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct rftype {
>  struct mbm_state {
>  	u64	chunks;
>  	u64	prev_msr;
> -	u64	prev_bw_msr;
> +	u64	prev_bw_chunks;
>  	u32	prev_bw;
>  	u32	delta_bw;
>  	bool	delta_comp;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index ac1a2e8998bb..8ae375e29256 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  
>  	if (rr->first) {
>  		memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
> -		m->prev_bw_msr = m->prev_msr = tval;
> +		m->prev_msr = tval;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -329,27 +329,32 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * mbm_bw_count() - Update bw count from values previously read by
> + *		    __mon_event_count().
> + * @rmid:	The rmid used to identify the cached mbm_state.
> + * @rr:		The struct rmid_read populated by __mon_event_count().
> + *
>   * Supporting function to calculate the memory bandwidth
> - * and delta bandwidth in MBps.
> + * and delta bandwidth in MBps. The chunks value previously read by
> + * __mon_event_count() is compared with the chunks value from the previous
> + * invocation. This must be called oncer per second to maintain values in MBps.

"must be called oncer" -> "must be called once"

>   */
>  static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  {
>  	struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(rr->r);
>  	struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
> -	u64 tval, cur_bw, chunks;
> +	u64 cur_bw, chunks, cur_chunks;
>  
> -	tval = __rmid_read(rmid, rr->evtid);
> -	if (tval & (RMID_VAL_ERROR | RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL))
> -		return;
> +	cur_chunks = rr->val;
> +	chunks = cur_chunks - m->prev_bw_chunks;
> +	m->prev_bw_chunks = cur_chunks;
>  
> -	chunks = mbm_overflow_count(m->prev_bw_msr, tval, hw_res->mbm_width);
> -	cur_bw = (get_corrected_mbm_count(rmid, chunks) * hw_res->mon_scale) >> 20;
> +	cur_bw = (chunks * hw_res->mon_scale) >> 20;
>  
>  	if (m->delta_comp)
>  		m->delta_bw = abs(cur_bw - m->prev_bw);
>  	m->delta_comp = false;
>  	m->prev_bw = cur_bw;
> -	m->prev_bw_msr = tval;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -509,6 +514,7 @@ static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d, int rmid)
>  	rr.first = false;
>  	rr.r = r;
>  	rr.d = d;
> +	rr.val = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This is protected from concurrent reads from user

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ