linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: Replace bare 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6185c67d2cca274aee019808f16855ecfd0c33d8.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 05 Mar 2022 16:49:09 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Henry Sloan <henryksloan@...il.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: Replace bare 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'

On Sat, 2022-03-05 at 15:55 -0500, Henry Sloan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Henry Sloan <henryksloan@...il.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c |  2 +-
[]
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
[]
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static int coalesced_mmio_in_range(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev,
>  static int coalesced_mmio_has_room(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev, u32 last)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *ring;
> -	unsigned avail;
> +	unsigned int avail;
>  
>  	/* Are we able to batch it ? */
>  

Instead of just converting this to unsigned int,
the function return could be converted to bool.

So could another int return in the same file.

Something like:
---
 virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
index 0be80c213f7f2..452ae20c9ed06 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
@@ -22,28 +22,28 @@ static inline struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *to_mmio(struct kvm_io_device *dev)
 	return container_of(dev, struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev, dev);
 }
 
-static int coalesced_mmio_in_range(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev,
-				   gpa_t addr, int len)
+static bool coalesced_mmio_in_range(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev,
+				    gpa_t addr, int len)
 {
 	/* is it in a batchable area ?
 	 * (addr,len) is fully included in
 	 * (zone->addr, zone->size)
 	 */
 	if (len < 0)
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 	if (addr + len < addr)
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 	if (addr < dev->zone.addr)
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 	if (addr + len > dev->zone.addr + dev->zone.size)
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
 }
 
-static int coalesced_mmio_has_room(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev, u32 last)
+static bool coalesced_mmio_has_room(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev, u32 last)
 {
 	struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *ring;
-	unsigned avail;
 
 	/* Are we able to batch it ? */
 
@@ -52,13 +52,8 @@ static int coalesced_mmio_has_room(struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_dev *dev, u32 last)
 	 * there is always one unused entry in the buffer
 	 */
 	ring = dev->kvm->coalesced_mmio_ring;
-	avail = (ring->first - last - 1) % KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_MAX;
-	if (avail == 0) {
-		/* full */
-		return 0;
-	}
 
-	return 1;
+	return (ring->first - last - 1) % KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_MAX != 0;
 }
 
 static int coalesced_mmio_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,