lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a65a0c0c-22bf-f24a-6f16-2f3358ccf681@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:56:56 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>,
        Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
        Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
        "J . Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>,
        "chihhao . chen" <chihhao.chen@...iatek.com>, sc.suh@...sung.com,
        cpgs@...sung.com, cpgsproxy5@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] support USB offload feature

On 04/03/2022 16:27, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/3/22 23:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:23:54PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
>>> This patchset is for USB offload feature, which makes Co-processor to use
>>> some memories of xhci. Especially it's useful for USB Audio scenario.
>>> Audio stream would get shortcut because Co-processor directly write/read
>>> data in xhci memories. It could get speed-up using faster memory like SRAM.
>>> That's why this also gives vendors flexibilty of memory management.
>>> Below pathches have been merged in AOSP kernel(android12-5.10) and I put
>>> together and split into 3 patches. Plus let me add user(xhci-exynos) module 
>>> to see how user could use it. 
>>>
>>> To sum up, it's for providing xhci memories to Co-Processor.
>>> It would cover DCBAA, Device Context, Tranfer Ring, Event Ring, ERST.
>>> It needs xhci hooks and to export some xhci symbols.
>>>
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: fix slab-out-of-bounds in xhci_vendor_get_ops
>>> ANDROID: usb: export built-in tracepoint functions
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: Use old init scheme when hook unavailable
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: free the offload TR by vendor hook
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: xhci: provide function prototype for xhci_address_device
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: add bus_suspend/bus_resume to xhci overrides
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: add address_device to xhci overrides
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: add max packet parameter on alloc_transfer_ring hook
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: add xhci hooks for vendor specific container context
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: export xhci symbols for ring management
>>> ANDROID: usb: host: export additional xhci symbols for ring management
>>> FROMLIST: usb: xhci-plat: add xhci_plat_priv_overwrite
>>> FROMLIST: usb: host: export symbols for xhci hooks usage
>>> FROMLIST: usb: host: add xhci hooks for USB offload
>>
>> What does that list of text mean?  You are only submitting 4 patches
>> here, not that many.
>>
>>>
>>> Below are owners of patches.
>>>
>>> Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>
>>> Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>
>>> Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>
>>> J. Avila <elavila@...gle.com>
>>> chihhao.chen <chihhao.chen@...iatek.com>
>>
>> What do you mean by this?  Did you loose authorship of the code you just
>> submitted?  That's not ok.  You always have to properly credit the
>> creators of the changes you submit to us for obvious legal reasons.
>>
>> Please fix up and resend this series properly.
> 
> Also: Greg might have received the full patch series, but I didn't, so I
> checked lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/, and it did not either, so it appears
> that there is a problem with sending the full series.

Yeah, lore did not get anything more than cover letter. What's more
interesting, the cover letter mention exynos:
  drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos.c | 2025 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
so get_maintainers.pl should point you to additional people and lists,
which are not present here.

What is even more interesting, such file
"drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos.c" does not exist... which could explain
missing CC above, but raises question what is this cover letter from? Is
it still Linux kernel or some other project?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ