[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ilsq5p0x.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:07:26 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
<shy828301@...il.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <ziy@...dia.com>,
<minchan@...nel.org>, <apopple@...dia.com>,
<ave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <o451686892@...il.com>,
<almasrymina@...gle.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<rcampbell@...dia.com>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <riel@...hat.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] mm/migration: return errno when isolate_huge_page
failed
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> writes:
> We should return errno (-EBUSY here) when failed to isolate the huge page
> rather than always return 1 which could confuse the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 6c2dfed2ddb8..279940c0c064 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1618,10 +1618,8 @@ static int add_page_for_migration(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> goto out_putpage;
>
> if (PageHuge(page)) {
> - if (PageHead(page)) {
> - isolate_huge_page(page, pagelist);
> - err = 1;
> - }
> + if (PageHead(page))
> + err = isolate_huge_page(page, pagelist) ? 1 : -EBUSY;
IMHO, it's better to determine the proper errno inside
isolate_huge_page() instead of in the caller. If you think it's
necessary to get errno here. How about change isolate_huge_page()
instead?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> } else {
> struct page *head;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists