[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a6e25ooy.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:14:37 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
<shy828301@...il.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <ziy@...dia.com>,
<minchan@...nel.org>, <apopple@...dia.com>,
<ave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <o451686892@...il.com>,
<almasrymina@...gle.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<rcampbell@...dia.com>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <riel@...hat.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] mm/migration: fix potential invalid node access
for reclaim-based migration
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> writes:
> If we failed to setup hotplug state callbacks for mm/demotion:online in
> some corner cases, node_demotion will be left uninitialized. Invalid node
> might be returned from the next_demotion_node() when doing reclaim-based
> migration. Use kcalloc to allocate node_demotion to fix the issue.
>
> Fixes: ac16ec835314 ("mm: migrate: support multiple target nodes demotion")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
LGTM! Thanks!
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 279940c0c064..7b1c0b988234 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2516,9 +2516,9 @@ static int __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - node_demotion = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids,
> - sizeof(struct demotion_nodes),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + node_demotion = kcalloc(nr_node_ids,
> + sizeof(struct demotion_nodes),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
>
> ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_DEAD, "mm/demotion:offline",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists