[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a93cba2-c877-73c6-e355-0b73fcb02cc6@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 20:11:46 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
<shy828301@...il.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <ziy@...dia.com>,
<minchan@...nel.org>, <apopple@...dia.com>,
<ave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <o451686892@...il.com>,
<almasrymina@...gle.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<rcampbell@...dia.com>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <riel@...hat.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] mm/migration: fix potential page refcounts leak in
migrate_pages
On 2022/3/7 13:01, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> writes:
>
>> In -ENOMEM case, there might be some subpages of fail-to-migrate THPs
>> left in thp_split_pages list. We should move them back to migration
>> list so that they could be put back to the right list by the caller
>> otherwise the page refcnt will be leaked here. Also adjust nr_failed
>> and nr_thp_failed accordingly to make vm events account more accurate.
>>
>> Fixes: b5bade978e9b ("mm: migrate: fix the return value of migrate_pages()")
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/migrate.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index e0db06927f02..6c2dfed2ddb8 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -1422,6 +1422,15 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> }
>>
>> nr_failed_pages += nr_subpages;
>> + /*
>> + * There might be some subpages of fail-to-migrate THPs
>> + * left in thp_split_pages list. Move them back to migration
>> + * list so that they could be put back to the right list by
>> + * the caller otherwise the page refcnt will be leaked.
>> + */
>> + list_splice_init(&thp_split_pages, from);
>> + nr_failed += retry;
>
> It appears that we don't need to change nr_failed, because we don't use
> it for this situation. Otherwise looks good to me.
>
You're right. nr_failed is not used for this case.
> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Many thanks for your review.
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
>> + nr_thp_failed += thp_retry;
>> goto out;
>> case -EAGAIN:
>> if (is_thp)
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists