lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:17:59 +0200
From:   Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] crypto: ccree: driver does not handle case where cryptlen =
 authsize =0

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:14 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:

> The "overlap" is in the sense of having more than one mapping within the
> same cacheline:
>
> [  142.458120] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=ba79f200 N=ba79f
> D=ba79f200 L=10 DMA_FROM_DEVICE attrs=0
> [  142.458156] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=445dc010 N=445dc
> D=445dc010 L=10 DMA_TO_DEVICE attrs=0
> [  142.458178] sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: SRC 0/1/1 445dc000 len=16 bi=0
> [  142.458215] sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: DST 0/1/1 ba79f200 len=16 bi=0
> [  142.458234] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=ba79f210 N=ba79f
> D=ba79f210 L=10 DMA_FROM_DEVICE attrs=0
>
> This actually illustrates exactly the reason why this is unsupportable.
> ba79f200 is mapped for DMA_FROM_DEVICE, therefore subsequently mapping
> ba79f210 for DMA_TO_DEVICE may cause the cacheline covering the range
> ba79f200-ba79f23f to be written back over the top of data that the
> device has already started to write to memory. Hello data corruption.
>
> Separate DMA mappings should be from separate memory allocations,
> respecting ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN.

hmm... I know I'm missing something here, but how does this align with
the following from active_cacheline_insert() in kernel/dma/debug.c ?

        /* If the device is not writing memory then we don't have any
         * concerns about the cpu consuming stale data.  This mitigates
         * legitimate usages of overlapping mappings.
         */
        if (entry->direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE)
                return 0;

Thanks,
Gilad

-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker

values of β will give rise to dom!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ