[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0011724c-655b-a667-9ff7-0e18c2a8c3f5@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:26:31 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux regressions report for mainline [2022-03-06]
On 07.03.22 14:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:32 AM Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>>
>> On 06.03.22 22:33, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 11:58 AM Regzbot (on behalf of Thorsten
>>> Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ========================================================
>>>> current cycle (v5.16.. aka v5.17-rc), culprit identified
>>>> ========================================================
>>>>
>>>> Follow-up error for the commit fixing "PCIe regression on APM Merlin (aarch64 dev platform) preventing NVME initialization"
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/regression/Yf2wTLjmcRj+AbDv@xps13.dannf/
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/Yf2wTLjmcRj%2BAbDv@xps13.dannf/
>>>>
>>>> By dann frazier, 29 days ago; 7 activities, latest 23 days ago; poked 13 days ago.
>>>> Introduced in c7a75d07827a (v5.17-rc1)
> Actually, it was introduced over a year ago in 6dce5aa59e0b. It was
> fixed in c7a75d07827a for XGene2, but that *further* broke XGene1
> which was just reported this cycle.
Many thx for the clarification, I'll update the regzbot entry
accordingly and..
>>> Hmm. The culprit may be identified, but it looks like we don't have a
>>> fix for it, so this may be one of those "left for later" things. It
>>> being Xgene, there's a limited number of people who care, I'm afraid.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, maybe 6dce5aa59e0b ("PCI: xgene: Use inbound resources
>>> for setup") should just be reverted as broken?
>>
>> I don't care much, I just hope someone once again will look into this,
>> as this (and the previous) regression are on my list for quite a while
>> already and process once again seems to have slowed down. :-/
>
> It's going to take some more debug patches from me as what's been
> tried so far didn't work and I'm not ready to give up and revert this
> cleanup.
...will mark it as "on backburner" then, which stands for "get it out of
sight, but don't forget about this completely".
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists