[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f039922-b9ea-d3a4-7e60-e5359840d511@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:24:54 +0000
From: <Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com>
To: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
<Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: convert atmel pwm to json-schema
On 07.03.2022 16:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2022 15:46, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>> Convert PWM binding for Atmel/Microchip SoCs to Device Tree Schema
>> format.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/pwm/atmel,at91sam-pwm.yaml | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-pwm.txt | 35 ----------------
>> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,at91sam-pwm.yaml
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-pwm.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,at91sam-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,at91sam-pwm.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2d5dd51a6a55
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,at91sam-pwm.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +# Copyright (C) 2022 Microchip Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/atmel,at91sam-pwm.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Atmel/Microchip PWM controller
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> + - $ref: "pwm.yaml#"
> allOf by convention should go between maintaners and properties.
>
Understood.
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + enum:
>> + - atmel,at91sam9rl-pwm
>> + - atmel,sama5d3-pwm
>> + - atmel,sama5d2-pwm
>> + - microchip,sam9x60-pwm
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + "#pwm-cells":
>> + const: 3
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: true
> This has to be either additionalProperties:false or
> "unevaluatedProperties:false".
>
>
Indeed, I believe `unevaluatedProperties: false` would be better here.
Thank you.
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + pwm0: pwm@...34000 {
>> + compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-pwm";
>> + reg = <0xf8034000 0x400>;
>> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> Also please change indentation to 2 or 4 spaces (like we use for all DTS
> examples). Four is preferred (only personally).
>
Noted, I will change the indentation to 4 spaces.
> You also need to update the path in MAINTAINERS.
>
Noted.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thank you for the feedback.
Sergiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists