linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Rework open/close/shutdown to avoid races

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YiYnpsryEDlrryzU@iki.fi>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 17:41:26 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc:     Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@...il.com>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Rework open/close/shutdown to avoid races

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:51:43AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 16:38 +0300, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
> > Avoid race condition at shutdown by shutting downn the TPM 2.0
> > devices synchronously. This eliminates the condition when the
> > shutdown sequence sets chip->ops to NULL leading to the following:
> > 
> > [ 1586.593561][ T8669] tpm2_del_space+0x28/0x73
> > [ 1586.598718][ T8669] tpmrm_release+0x27/0x33wq
> > [ 1586.603774][ T8669] __fput+0x109/0x1d
> > [ 1586.608380][ T8669] task_work_run+0x7c/0x90
> > [ 1586.613414][ T8669] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0xb8/0x128
> > [ 1586.619522][ T8669] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > [ 1586.626068][ T8669] RIP: 0033:0x4cb4bb
> 
> An actual bug report would have been helpful.  However, from this trace
> it's easy to deduce that tpm2_del_space() didn't get converted to the
> get/put of the chip ops ... it's still trying to do its own half arsed
> thing with tpm_chip_start() and the mutex.  So isn't a much simpler fix
> simply to convert it as below?  compile tested only, but if you can
> test it out I'll send a proper patch.
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> index 784b8b3cb903..0c0cd225046f 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-space.c
> @@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ int tpm2_init_space(struct tpm_space *space, unsigned int buf_size)
>  
>  void tpm2_del_space(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space)
>  {
> -	mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
> -	if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) {
> +
> +	if (tpm_try_get_ops(chip) == 0) {
>  		tpm2_flush_sessions(chip, space);
> -		tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> +		tpm_put_ops(chip);
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
> +
>  	kfree(space->context_buf);
>  	kfree(space->session_buf);
>  }
> 

James, would it possible for you to construct a proper patch from this and
send it so we could include it to the next PR (use my tree as baseline)?

BR, Jarkko