linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] usb: host: add xhci-exynos module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 08:42:38 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>,
        Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
        Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
        "J . Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>, sc.suh@...sung.com,
        cpgs@...sung.com, cpgsproxy5@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] usb: host: add xhci-exynos module

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:17:36PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> This is for reference to introduce usb offload as seeing how a user does.
> We only care DCBAA, Device Context, Transfer Ring, Event Ring, and ERST.
> They are allocated on specific address(SRAM) for Co-Processor.
> Co-processor could use them directly without xhci driver after then.

No one cares about your "reference".  Without a real, actual users
crappy hooks like this are completely uninteresting.