[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiZCypeuJ+0FCJ+w@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:37:14 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 08:43:03PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Mike,
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:49 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > So ideally, the physical memory detection and registration should follow
> > something like:
> >
> > * memblock_reserve() the memory used by firmware, kernel and initrd
> > * detect NUMA topology
> > * add memory regions along with their node ids to memblock.
> >
> > s390::setup_arch() is a good example of doing early reservations:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c#n988
> I have a fast reading of S390, and I think we can do some adjust:
> 1, call memblock_set_node(0, ULONG_MAX, &memblock.memory, 0) in
> early_memblock_init().
> 2, move memblock_reserve(PHYS_OFFSET, 0x200000) and
> memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(&_text), __pa_symbol(&_end) -
> __pa_symbol(&_text)) to early_memblock_init().
> 3, Reserve initrd memory in the first place.
> It is nearly the same as the S390, then.
It does not have to look like the same as s390 :)
The important thing is to reserve all the memory before memblock
allocations are possible.
> > > > > +early_param("memmap", early_parse_memmap);
> > > >
> > > > The memmap= processing is a hack indented to workaround bugs in firmware
> > > > related to the memory detection. Please don't copy if over unless there is
> > > > really strong reason.
> > >
> > > Hmmm, I have read the documents, most archs only support mem=limit,
> > > but MIPS support mem=limit@...e. memmap not only supports
> > > memmap=limit@...e, but also a lot of advanced syntax. LoongArch needs
> > > both limit and limit@...e syntax. So can we make our code to support
> > > only mem=limit and memmap=limit@...e, and remove all other syntax
> > > here?
> >
> > The documentation describes what was there historically and both these
> > options tend not to play well with complex memory layouts.
> >
> > If you must have them it's better to use x86 as an example rather than
> > MIPS, just take into the account that on x86 memory always starts from 0,
> > so they never needed to have a different base.
> >
> > For what use-cases LoongArch needs options?
>
> The use-case of limit@...e syntax is kdump, because our kernel is not
> relocatable. I'll use X86 as an example.
I missed that mem= can be used several times, so with MIPS implementation
it's possible to define something like "mem=limit0@...e0 mem=limit1@...e1"
and this will create two contiguous memory regions.
> Huacai
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists