[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20f47ec9-3b5b-5326-b1c3-4b1a0c38ef46@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:57:30 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mike.kravetz@...cle.com, shy828301@...il.com, willy@...radead.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, ziy@...dia.com, minchan@...nel.org,
apopple@...dia.com, ave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
o451686892@...il.com, almasrymina@...gle.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
rcampbell@...dia.com, peterx@...hat.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com,
mhocko@...e.com, riel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] mm/migration: fix potential page refcounts leak in
migrate_pages
Hi Miaohe,
On 3/4/2022 5:34 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> In -ENOMEM case, there might be some subpages of fail-to-migrate THPs
> left in thp_split_pages list. We should move them back to migration
> list so that they could be put back to the right list by the caller
> otherwise the page refcnt will be leaked here. Also adjust nr_failed
> and nr_thp_failed accordingly to make vm events account more accurate.
>
> Fixes: b5bade978e9b ("mm: migrate: fix the return value of migrate_pages()")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index e0db06927f02..6c2dfed2ddb8 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1422,6 +1422,15 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> }
>
> nr_failed_pages += nr_subpages;
> + /*
> + * There might be some subpages of fail-to-migrate THPs
> + * left in thp_split_pages list. Move them back to migration
> + * list so that they could be put back to the right list by
> + * the caller otherwise the page refcnt will be leaked.
> + */
> + list_splice_init(&thp_split_pages, from);
> + nr_failed += retry;
> + nr_thp_failed += thp_retry;
Yes, I think we missed this case before, and your patch looks right. But
we should also update the 'rc' to return the correct number of pages
that were not migrated, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists