linux-kernel - Re: Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: ata: ahci-platform: Convert DT bindings to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YiaBxlBkpav/7mug@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:05:58 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: ata: ahci-platform:
 Convert DT bindings to yaml

On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/03/2022 11:41, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 06. März 2022 um 11:27 Uhr
> >> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> >>>     add compatibles used together with generic-ahci
> >>>       - marvell,berlin2-ahci
> >>
> >> This is fine, just mention it in commit msg.
> >>
> >>>       - qcom,apq8064-ahci
> >>>       - qcom,ipq806x-ahci
> >>
> >> These you need to consult with qcom-sata.txt. This could be a following
> >> commit which will integrate qcom-sata.txt and remove it.
> > 
> > this depends on Robs opinion
> 
> Then maybe precise the question for Rob...

I would leave qcom separate, but the warnings should be fixed. For that 
you need a custom 'select' schema that lists everything but 
'generic-ahci'. Adding the berlin compatible looks right.

> >> Either you have
> >> binding document for all devices or you create a common part, like for UFS:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220222145854.358646-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/
> >> https://github.com/krzk/linux/commits/n/dt-bindings-ufs-v2
> >>
> >> The choice depends more or less on complexity of bindings, IOW, how big
> >> and complicated bindings would be if you combine everything to one YAML.
> >>
> >> In the case of UFS, the devices differ - by clocks, resets, phys and
> >> sometimes supplies. Therefore it easier to have one common shared part
> >> and several device bindings.
> >>
> >> AHCI looks more consistent - except that Qualcomm - so maybe better to
> >> have one document.
> >>
> >>>     increase reg-count to 2 (used in omap5-l4.dtsi)
> >>>     increase clock-count to 5 (used in qcom-apq8064.dtsi)
> >>
> >> This would need allOf+if.
> > 
> > if i get ok from rob i add only the berlin-compatible and skip the 
> > qcom+reg/clock-change in the first applied version. Adding the 
> > allOf/if (and making it right) will only delay the sata-binding/dts-change.
> 
> I don't get what is the problem with delaying this patch for the time
> needed to make the bindings correct? Especially that alternative is to
> add bindings document which soon will need to be modified, e.g. split
> into common part. Is there a particular hurry with these bindings
> conversion?

Qcom doesn't use sata-port nodes, so I don't think there is anything to 
share. And if it did, that's already in sata-common.yaml.

Rob